See Rockset
in action

Get a product tour with a Rockset engineer

Apache Druid vs Rockset

Compare and contrast Apache Druid and Rockset by architecture, ingestion, queries, performance, and scalability.

Apache Druid vs Rockset Architecture

Architecture
Apache Druid
Rockset
Deployment model
• SaaS or self managed. • Imply’s Druid cloud offering requires customers to configure, scale, and capacity plan
SaaS - infrastructure, software and cluster ops managed by service provider
Use of storage hierarchy
• Queries are served from data on disk and an in-memory cache • Cloud storage or HDFS for deep storage
• SSDs store shared hot data, accessible from any Virtual Instance cluster • Cloud storage for durability
Isolation of ingest and query
• Ingestion and queries are run on the same node by default • The ingestion and querying processes can be run on separate nodes, however not for real-time data
Yes - separate compute clusters (Virtual Instances) for ingest and query
Separation of compute and storage
No, although Imply’s offering separates compute and storage
Yes
Isolation for multiple applications
No
Yes - separate compute cluster (Virtual Instance) for each application

Druid’s architecture employs nodes called data servers that are used for both ingestion and queries. High ingestion or query load can cause CPU and memory contention compared with Druid alternatives. Breaking apart the pre-packaged ingestion and query server components involves planning ahead and additional complexity, and is not dynamic.

Rockset is built to be a cloud-only database and does not have a self-managed option. It disaggregates compute from both hot storage and cloud storage, allowing multiple isolated compute clusters to run on the same shared data.


Apache Druid vs Rockset Ingestion

Ingestion
Apache Druid
Rockset
Data sources
Data connectors to: • Events streams (e.g. Kafka, Kinesis) • Data lakes (e.g. S3, Google Cloud Storage) • RDBMS and HDFS databases CDC events from databases require manual conversion to Druid events
Managed data connectors to: • Events streams (e.g. Kafka, Kinesis) • Database CDC (e.g. MongoDB, DynamoDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL) • Data lakes (e.g. S3, Google Cloud Storage)
Semi structured data
Druid requires flattening nested data at ingest and maintaining a flattening spec as the schema changes over time
• Ingests JSON and XML without a predefined schema • Ingests nested data
Transformations and rollups
Yes, using ingestion specs written in JSON support rollups and simple transformations. SQL ingest transformations available for Imply
Yes - using SQL ingest transformations

Druid has built-in connectors that manage ingestion from common data sources. Unlike some Druid competitors, it doesn’t support nested data, so data must be flattened at ingest. Denormalization is also required at ingest, increasing operational burden for certain use cases.

Rockset has built-in connectors that manage streaming ingestion from common data sources. It has native support for semi-structured data, so that nested JSON and XML can be ingested and queried as is.

Apache Druid vs Rockset Performance

Performance
Apache Druid
Rockset
Updates
Druid segments become immutable once committed and published, making it more appropriate for append-only use cases
Documents are mutable and can be updated at the field level
Indexing
• Bitmap index
• Converged Index (row, columnar and inverted index) built on all data by default • All queries are resolved through the index
Query latency
Typically sub-second query latency for denormalized, flattened datasets up to 100s of TBs
50-1000ms queries on 100s of TB
Storage format
Columnar format partitioned by time
Converged Index, comprising a rowstore, columnstore and inverted index
Streaming ingest
• Sub 15 seconds
• Ingests on a per-record basis • Data latency is typically 1-2 seconds

Druid is designed to make streaming data queryable as quickly as possible. JOINs are either impossible or incur a large performance penalty. Updates are only possible via batch jobs. Druid leverages data denormalization and write-time aggregation at ingestion to reduce query latency.

Rockset is designed to make streaming data queryable as quickly as possible by avoiding the need to batch data. It also updates documents efficiently by only reindexing fields that are part of an update request. Rockset indexes all data by default, which results in storage amplification but also enables low-latency queries that require less compute.


Apache Druid vs Rockset Queries

Queries
Apache Druid
Rockset
Joins
Yes, only for datasets that fit in memory, and with a query latency penalty
Yes
Query language
Druid native queries • Druid SQL
SQL - with extensions for nested data
Developer tooling
• Druid SQL API
• Data APIs - saved SQL queries executed via REST endpoint • Python, Java, Node.js and Go SDKs • UDFs
Visualization tools
Pivot, maintained by Imply
Integrations with Tableau, Looker, Grafana, Superset, Power BI, Retoolwhic

Druid has a native JSON-based query language and provides Druid SQL as an alternative that translates into its native queries. JOINs are not recommended.

Rockset supports SQL as its native query language and can perform SQL joins. Users can create data APIs by storing SQL queries in Rockset that are executed from dedicated REST endpoints. Rockset integrates with some common visualization tools, but BI is not Rockset’s primary use case.


Apache Druid vs Rockset Scalability

Scalability
Apache Druid
Rockset
Vertical scaling
Users can manually increase or decrease server sizes
Resize compute clusters (Virtual Instances) via API or in the console
Horizontal scaling
• Users can manually add additional nodes to a scaled-out cluster. • Imply automates some of the horizontal scaling process.
• Add or remove compute clusters (Virtual Instances) via API or in the console • Scale out compute clusters for higher concurrency • Use separate compute clusters to isolate ingest from query or for multiple isolated applications • No rebalancing required

Druid users are exposed to complex decisions about the number and size of servers as clusters are scaled.

Rockset Virtual Instances are distributed compute clusters that can be scaled up for faster queries or scaled out for practically unlimited concurrency or if compute isolation is needed. Rockset has shared storage that scales automatically and independently, so no rebalancing is required.