Elasticsearch vs Weaviate
Compare and contrast Elasticsearch and Weaviate by architecture, ingestion, queries, performance, and scalability.
Elasticsearch vs Weaviate Ingestion
Elasticsearch supports both streaming and bulk ingestion. It recommends using fewer Lucene segments and avoiding updates and reindexing to save on compute costs. Elasticsearch supports searches across large-scale data, including vector embeddings and metadata.
Weaviate supports batch insertion of vectors and updates and in-place updates for vectors and metadata. Weaviate supports searches across high dimensional vector embeddings.
Elasticsearch vs Weaviate Indexing
Elasticsearch supports KNN and ANN search using HNSW indexing algorithms. Elasticsearch provides inverted indexes and vector search indexes and uses vectorization to speed up query execution. Users are responsible for index maintenance.
Weaviate supports KNN and ANN search using HNSW indexing algorithms. Weaviate provides inverted indexes and vector search indexes and uses vectorization to speed up query execution. Users are responsible for index maintenance.
Elasticsearch vs Weaviate Querying
Weaviate uses a strict schema system with all of the fields and their type specified before the data is indexed.
Elasticsearch supports REST APIs.
Weaviate pre-filters data before an approximate kNN search. Weaviate supports a GraphQL API for search.
Elasticsearch vs Weaviate Ecosystem
Elasticsearch vs Weaviate Architecture
Elasticsearch is built for on-prem with a tightly coupled architecture. Scaling Elasticsearch requires data and infrastructure expertise and management. Elasticsearch is used by enterprises including Booking.com and Cisco.
Weaviate is built for on-prem with a tightly coupled architecture. Scaling Weaviate requires data and infrastructure expertise and management.