Pinecone vs Rockset
Compare and contrast Pinecone and Rockset by architecture, ingestion, queries, performance, and scalability.
Pinecone vs Rockset Ingestion
Pinecone supports batch insertion of vectors and updates and in-place updates for vectors and metadata. Pinecone supports searches across high dimensional vector embeddings.
Rockset is built for streaming data and is a mutable database, supporting in-place updates for vectors and metadata. As a real-time search and analytics database, Rockset supports searches across large-scale data, including vector embeddings and metadata.
Pinecone vs Rockset Indexing
Pinecone supports KNN and ANN search. Pinecone supports sparse-dense vectors for hybrid search. Pinecone handles all index management.
Rockset supports KNN and ANN search using FAISS indexing algorithms. Rockset consolidates search, vector search, columnar and row indexes into a Converged Index to support a wide range of query patterns out of the box. Vectorization is used to speed up query execution
Pinecone vs Rockset Querying
Pinecone supports a limited number of metadata field types. It recommends avoiding indexing high-cardinality metadata as that will consume significantly more memory. The maximum results a query will return with metadata filtering is 1,000.
Pinecone applies a filter during an approximate kNN search. Pinecone supports REST APIs.
Rockset supports pre-filtering and applying a filter during an approximate kNN search. Rockset supports SQL and REST APIs. Rockset applies a filter during an approximate kNN search.
Pinecone vs Rockset Ecosystem
Pinecone vs Rockset Architecture
Pinecone is a cloud-service with a tightly-coupled architecture.
Rockset is built for the cloud and separates compute-storage and compute-compute. The compute used for ingestion and indexing of vector embeddings is isolates from the compute used for query serving. Rockset is used by enterprises including Allianz, JetBlue and Whatnot.